Skip to main content

Table 2 Bivariate analysis table showing the association between the type of beneficiaries and mental health treatment outputs among the sample of MHPSS beneficiaries in NWS (n = 462)

From: Provision of mental health and psychosocial support services to health workers and community members in conflict-affected Northwest Syria: a mixed-methods study

Variables

Healthcare workers (n, %)

Other beneficiaries (n, %)

Total

P-value

(n, %)

Symptoms and concerns (sleeping problems, feeling down/anxious, etc.)

0.01

 Very improved

50 (21.5)

29 (12.7)

79 (17.1)

 Improved

181 (77.7)

191 (83.4)

372 (80.5)

 Same

2 (0.9)

7 (3.1)

9 (1.9)

 Not improved

0 (0)

2 (0.9)

2 (0.4)

Productivity, ability to work/learn

 < 0.001

 Very good

59 (25.3)

21 (9.2)

80 (17.3)

 Good

161 (69.1)

154 (67.2)

315 (68.2)

 Fair

13 (5.6)

51 (22.3)

64 (13.9)

 Bad

0 (0)

3 (1.3)

3 (0.6)

Ability to take care for others and make social interactions

 < 0.001

 Very good

68 (29.2)

29 (12.7)

97 (21.0)

 Good

151 (64.8)

152 (66.4)

303 (65.6)

 Fair

14 (6.0)

43 (18.8)

57 (12.3)

 Bad

0 (0)

4 (1.7)

4 (0.9)

 Very bad

0 (0)

1 (0.4)

1 (0.2)

Mental health state/"your abilities to cope with the normal stresses of life, work productively and fruitfully, and to make a contribution to your community"

 < 0.001

 Very good

67 (28.8)

40 (17.5)

107 (23.2)

 Good

145 (62.2)

136 (59.6)

281 (60.8)

 Fair

21 (9.0)

44 (19.3)

65 (14.1)

 Bad

0 (0.0)

8 (3.5)

8 (1.7)

 Very bad

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)

0 (0.0)