Table 5 Course evaluation results stratified by learning modality and by course or more
Evaluation component | Learners’ evaluation | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
%Synchronous (n = 25) | %Synchronous and asynchronous (n = 20) | %Asynchronous (n = 21) | %Course or more* (n = 28) | |
Course delivery method | ||||
The course objectives were clearly stated or presented | 18 (71.7) | 18 (91.4) | 18 (86.8) | 23 (83.2) |
The content was relevant to my needs | 16 (62.3) | 17 (84.5) | 16 (76.3) | 21 (74.5) |
The course objectives were fulfilled | 17 (67.9) | 18 (89.7) | 17 (84.2) | 22 (80.5) |
I would take another course via this delivery method | 19 (77.4) | 18 (89.7) | 20 (97.4) | 24 (87.3) |
The allocated time for the course was appropriate | 16 (62.2) | 16 (82.8) | 19 (89.5) | 21 (77.1) |
The pace of the course was appropriate | 17 (66.0) | 16 (79.3) | 19 (89.5) | 21 (77.2) |
Course content | ||||
The course content was organized and easy to follow | 17 (66.1) | 18 (89.7) | 17 (84.2) | 22 (79.8) |
My knowledge and competence in this subject matter increased | 18 (73.6) | 18 (89.7) | 19 (89.5) | 23 (83.9) |
I have gained useful competencies from this course | 17 (69.8) | 17 (84.5) | 18 (86.8) | 22 (79.9) |
I am satisfied with the overall quality of the course | 17 (66.1) | 17 (86.2) | 17 (84.2) | 22 (78.5) |
I would recommend this course to others | 18 (73.6) | 16 (82.7) | 17 (84.2) | 22 (79.8) |
I am willing to participate in future courses held by GHI | 20 (81.1) | 19 (98.3) | 20 (94.7) | 26 (91.3) |
Instructors | ||||
The instructor was well prepared and knowledgeable about the topic | 19 (77.4) | 18 (91.3) | 19 (92.1) | 24 (86.6) |
The instructor communicated information clearly and effectively | 19 (75.5) | 17 (86.2) | 18 (86.8) | 23 (82.5) |
The instructor stimulated interest in this subject | 16 (66) | 16 (82.8) | 17 (84.2) | 21 (77.1) |
I am satisfied with the overall performance of the instructor | 19 (77.3) | 17 (86.3) | 18 (86.9) | 23 (83.3) |