Skip to main content

Table 5 Binary logistic regression (odds ratios in parenthesis) results estimating awareness, ever use, current use, and unmet need for family planning by women’s background characteristics and site of refuge

From: Family planning in refugee settings: findings and actions from a multi-country study

Explanatory Measures

Outcome measures

Awareness

Ever use

Current use

Unmet need

Age (Ref: 20–49 years)

 15–19 years

−1.287 (0.28)***

−1.573 (0.21)***

−1.118 (0.33)***

0.331 (1.39)

Marital Status (Ref: Not married)

 Married

 Missing information

0.733 (2.08)***

0.304 (1.36)

1.730 (5.64)***

−0.496 (0.61)+

2.598 (13.44)***

0.008 (1.01)

1.972 (7.19)***

0.069 (1.07)

Education (Ref: Never attended)

 Ever attended

1.015 (2.76)***

0.688 (1.99)***

0.688 (1.99)***

−0.285 (0.75)

Site of refuge (Ref: Cox’s Bazar)

    

 Ali Addeh

−3.072 (0.05)***

−2.994 (0.05)***

−2.899 (0.06)***

−1.292 (0.28)**

 Eastleigh

−2.161 (0.12)***

−2.248 (0.11)***

−2.150 (0.12)***

−0.316 (0.73)

 Nakivale

−0.931 (0.39)***

−1.819 (0.16)***

−1.600 (0.20)***

1.227 (3.41)***

 Amman

−0.249 (0.78)

−0. 819 (0.44)***

−1. 115 (0.50)***

0.227 (1.26)

 Kuala Lumpur

−0.673 (0.51)**

−1.262 (0.28)***

−0.690 (0.50)***

0.623 (1.87)***

Model Fit Statistics

    

 N

2733

2733

2733

2733

 Intercept

1.730 (5.64)***

−0.545 (0.58)***

−2.740 (0.07)***

−4.513 (0.01)***

 −2 Log Likelihood

2320.80

2757.02

2124.31

1193.12

 Cox & Snell R Square (%)

25.8

27.9

19.7

5.5

 Nagelkerke R Square (%)

37.8

37.8

31.3

14.2

 Percent correctly classified (%)

79.5

77.8

80.2

93.3

 Model X 2

814.49***

892.14***

600.88***

155.16***

 d.f.

9

9

9

9

  1. + p <.10; * p <.05; ** p <.01; *** p <.001